MMMNAVY said...
Bee it seems to me, and I caveat this big time because it is a broad base generalization and therefore has no academic validity, that diet's seem to work better for people with fairly mild/moderate disease. But I had alot of severe damage that was missed due to not having a pill cam or long egd done when I started with these diets. I did have severe bleeding problems, so that is why I always caution with this.
I was wondering about
that as well, but I was also wondering if it had to do with age? There seems to be a time gap here. Not in our chronological age but rather of how long we've been ill and when it began e.g. someone diagnosed in the 60's didn't have access to the treatment we have now and was therefore at the mercy of the disease in ways I can't even imagine.
My doctor said mine was pretty severe given fistulizing and bleeding they weren't really able to stop even with high doses of IV steroids, BUT at the same time I think they acted as aggressively at the disease using treatment that has only recently become available. I feel like if I had been this age 20 years ago that diet wouldn't be helping me like it is now..
I know there are always exceptions. There are a lot of members on this board with different experiences with diet so who knows?