Some labs indicate whether they used the HS assay on the lab report but, at least here, the labs we go to now only use the HS assay.
On those labs the amount is reported in mg/dL and the top of the normal range is 0.8 mg/dL. It is probably not correct to say this is the "same" as 8 mg/L.
Remember that every lab test has a margin of error for the normal range. As a general rule, the larger the normal range the larger the probable margin of error.
If I recall my statistics correctly (please feel free to correct me anyone with a more thorough knowledge of this), if you assume that the acceptable standard error of measurement (SEM) - or in lay terms the margin of error - is normally distributed and has a standard deviation of 5% then you would get these results from each test:
If you're using the non HS assay with a max normal level of 5, then 68% of the scores that have that result would actually fall somewhere between 4.75 and 5.25 (1 standard deviation of 5% from the mean).
If you're using the HS assay with a max normal of 0.8 then that score could be said to be somewhere between 0.76 and 0.84
If I told you my CrP was 0.76 mg/dL and then told you my CrP was 4.75 mg/L you would think those scores are very different right? But actually they both represent the same thing.
This is one reason why it's not always helpful to try to compare tests that measure the same thing but do it differently.
And I just made a whole bunch of assumptions that may not be true - especially the assumption that CrP results follow a normal distribution.
Hope that does more than muddy the waters for you.