I have had 3 colonoscopies and no one has done a terminal ileum biopsy.
Colonoscopy #1- no biopsies at all, declared normal based on endoscopic appearance
Colonoscopy #2- did rectal biopsies because he said that the rectum is ONE place you can be normal in appearance
but biopsies will show inflammation.
Colonoscopy # 3- this is the gi that ended up treating me with pentasa based on a trial of medication. He told me he would biopsy the terminal ileum and ended up only doing 3 biopies of my colon. He said that the pill camera would probably not be helpful
Colonoscopy #4 - coming up in a few weeks. This new gi says he WILL biopsy the terminal ileum because "small intestinal crohns is very rare without some involvement of the terminal ileum".
My question is: If crohns can be only at the microscopic level and can be patchy isn't it quite possible that even 3 biopsies throughout the colon would miss it, as would rectal biopsies if I didn't have it in my rectum. I have heard of people with crohns only other areas of the Small intestine, or only in the stomach etc.
All I can hope for at this point is a positive biopsy in the terminal ileum as its been 5 years and this area has never been biopsied. BUT I've been treated for 5 years so if there is no inflammation does that rule out crohns? I don't think so. It could mean that I had it mild and have been successfully treated (I know, not cured) I have lots of questions for this new gi. If there is inflammation I would say that means my treatment has not been that successful. Sounds like a no win situation to me. A few years ago I stopped trying to find out what is wrong and just want to feel better, whatever that takes. Sounds like I'm back to the beginning again.