Kazbern said...
If you don't have fistulizing Crohn's now, you are not likely to develop it. It is often said that Crohn's presents one way or the other, and rarely changes its nature.
Hmm. Somebody on here who has had Crohn's for 22 years developed her first fistula a few months ago. However, she was also never in remission during that time: if she'd been able to get into remission for a long time, the fistula might never have developed.
Thing with fistulas (and strictures too) is that they can be both short term and long term complications of Crohn's: the disease seems to attack at variable rates in different people. Early onset Crohn's tends to be mainly inflammatory, and then develop into a stricturing or fistulising subtype (or both if you're really lucky) over time. I had ileocolitis for 13 years and ended up with a stricture in my terminal ileum and needing my entire colon removed, it got that bad: but no fistulas. My rectal inflammation was moderate, but not as bad as in the rest of my colon.
Much, much, much easier said than done, but I think you would be better off trying to accept that a few bad things might happen, but if they do, you'll deal with them as and when they occur. I'm a dreadful coper, but it's amazing what you deal with when basically you have no choice. Also, it's not all unremitting doom'n'gloom: most people go through periods of remissions and flare-ups, even the ones with quite bad disease. Remissions can last for years, even decades, at a time.
PS: I would recommend azathioprine. See dfdavedf's topic about
thiopurines (azathioprine and 6MP are both thiopurines).
PPS: It wouldn't be a good idea to take rectal meds unless you actually have inflammation in the rectal/sigmoid area. Having solid poos with no urgency is a good sign, but if you're worried asked to be examined in that area.
Hope I haven't made you feel any worse... :-/