Thanks :p Yeah, it's been a long ride. I was diagnosed in 2000. It was mild for the first five years, so not much of a problem, but after that point...
Is James' doctor a surgeon by any chance? It's been my experience that surgeons just seem to want cut things out, while GIs are far less pro-surgery. My GI did try almost everything to be fair: Remicade (including doubling the dose at one point), Humira, Methotrexate, even an elemental liquid diet. I don't think he ever mentioned Cyclosporin, though; not sure why. Once Remicade failed, he seemed to lose his optimism that anything else would work. For example, one thing I did ask him about
was anti-MAP therapy; a gruelling triple-antibiotic therapy designed to eliminate MAP, a bacteria thought by some to be a cause of Crohn's.
His answer wasn't encouraging. He only knew two people who'd been on it: one person went into remission but their Crohn's came back 6 months later and the other it didn't work for at all.
He said he would refer me to a Crohn's specialist if I wanted to, but I let that slide. Not entirely sure why. Again, I wish I had done it now. I don't think it would have been likely to have saved my colon, but still, I wish I had at least tried.
So a part of me wants to encourage your husband to exhaust every possible option; the other part doesn't want him to go through the crapness of one therapy after another failing. He will be debilitated so long as he has severe IBD going on; it is a debilitating disease on just about
every front. I would also check that your husband has been tested for anaemia; it's a common side-effect of having IBD, but an iron transfusion can easily correct it. A very low haemoglobin will also make you feel exhausted.
Re steroids. It usually took a few days for my BMs to settle down; the abdominal pain and fevers were always the first to go (aided by morphine, admittedly). I think there is still time for your husband to respond to the steroids; but there is a possibility he is a poor to non-responder (20-30% of people are from what I've read).
That said, steroids are only of use as a stopgap med. They get you into remission quickly; but they don't maintain it. And they're too dangerous to be used as maintenance medication, so you cannot stay on them long-term. One thing to be wary of with Pred is dependency. It's not psychologically addictive, but your body becomes increasingly dependent on it just to function, never mind to keep the disease at bay. That's more likely to happen if you've been on repeated courses of the stuff, or if you have been on a high dose for months on end.
If steroids don't knock you into a sustained remission the first time you take them (I'm talking at least a year), then in my opinion they're not worth taking again after that. They're not going to work any better the second, third or fourth time; in fact they'll work slightly less well each time you take them. As you might be able to tell, I'm a bit jaundiced about
Pred, to say the least.
But I do fully understand you wanting the steroids to work for your husband. I hope that they do, but I also hope he finds another med to take over and keep him in remission.
And another super long post from me >_>.
Post Edited (NiceCupOfTea) : 10/12/2013 5:34:13 PM (GMT-6)