Posted 2/24/2014 7:34 PM (GMT 0)
Again, congratulations on getting the disability! And thank you for the detailed description of what you went through.
My depression was not considered, I guess because it is not major depression but only a low-grade depression, according to my therapist.
However, I find it very interesting that in some cases, they award disability back to the day a person filed, sometimes they award back to the day the person quit working, and in my case, they awarded mine back to the day I saw the vein doctor, which was 3 MONTHS after I filed (September 2012).
I was even told by an SS person that I would be awarded back to the date in 2009 that I was turned down the FIRST time I filed for disability. I don't understand their rules at all. I think with all the disability cases hitting the system in the past five years, they have gotten stingy and look for ways to award less than what they would have even five years ago. For example, my nephew's wife was awarded disability for COPD and got it within three months after she filed, but the award they gave her went all the way back to the day she quit working, which was some 3-4 years before she even applied for disability! WEIRD!
I did have other diagnoses. Here's what I remember off the top of my head: Fibromyalgia, asthma, depression and anxiety, interstitial cystitis (very painful), sciatica (both sides), facet joint arthropathy, DDD, severe nerve pain in my left leg, chronic blepharitis, multiple chemical sensitivities, allergies (I get allergy shots), and severe problems with circulation in my legs, even after undergoing at least six vein surgeries last year. I also use O2 at night because my oxygen saturation goes down into the 70s when I sleep.
Oh, and I also have a 1-inch fatty tumor on my sacral ala, and they can't take it out without taking off part of the top of my sacrum. It does cause pain, also, and has to be monitored with an MRI every 2 years to make sure it isn't growing. And I also have urinary incontinence, so I leak all the time and have to use a pad 24/7. That causes a lot of problems when I'm sick and cough so much (when my asthma is bad, I cough a lot).
I can't believe the judge didn't even consider the interstitial cystitis. Not only is it very painful, but from the time I arrived at the hearing office, I went to the bathroom five times in about 45 minutes while waiting for the hearing to start. It always gets worse when I'm under stress. Still, he said that could be controlled by medicine. I don't think he knows much about IC and how debilitating it can be. I don't know any employer who would let someone take even 3 bathroom breaks every hour for an 8-hour job, at least in my profession, which was medical transcription, and they expected my butt to be in that chair for hours at a time.
Unlike you, karona, my judge did not even consider my doctor's letter (she's an NP-c with her own practice) or my therapist's. However, he did consider that I have been under treatments for all my conditions for a long time and all that was well documented.
I do second getting a lawyer. In this area, they won't take you as a client until you have been denied once and they will do the appeal. I didn't have a lot of contact with my lawyer, but he did an excellent job. He couldn't believe that I didn't get approved when I applied, considering all my diagnoses.
As to the age thing, Diane: When I first applied for disability in 2008, I saw this same lawyer, and he told me that I probably wouldn't get a favorable judgment for fibromyalgia unless I was at least 55 years old. I was 53 at the time. Of course, at that time, I hadn't been diagnosed with the IC and vein problems. So, my "advanced age" was 57 when I was awarded disability. :)
I knew I was getting disability when I left the courtroom, even though the lawyer had told me earlier that I wouldn't know until I got a letter after the hearing. I think they tell people that because, if someone who might cause trouble is denied while in the hearing, they could go off on the lawyer or judge. So, I was very surprised when the judge and the lawyer were haggling (over my head) about the date the judge would approve the disability back to. And then when they were done, the judge asked the occupational person whether he thought I could work, and he told them no, that he didn't think any employer would hire me when I have to put my legs above my head 3 times (for an hour each time) when trying to work an 8-hour shift.
I just find it very interesting that we each have such a different experience and the laws are so arbitrary in each state and sometimes even in the same state or region.