Hi Mary and Kariamon,
Thanks for your replies. I'm currently hiring medical reviewers for my case. Even THEY differ in opinion. The med board of our state is also at fault for not providing me with the information on my 2 original surgeons' 7 past claims and suits when I inquired pre-surgery. I would never have gone to them if I had been told of these. I've since received copies and all reflect patterns of overly invasive surgery one of which the patient died 15 days post-op due to ignored post-op leak at the sigmoid resection anastomosis (They did the SAME 7 procedures on her as they did on me). I think these 2 goons (spelling?) have a
cookie cutter approach, they do the whole vagina, rectum, sigmoid, bladder, ovary surgery on everyone that walks through the door needed or not!) They get paid per procedure and need to haul in the big bucks for the company they work for. They are not even part of the hospital system they represented themselves as being affililated with. Their parent company has just built a multi- million dollar sleep study center no doubt with some of the bucks they have hauled in doing this multi organ surgery. CEO of their company said they have done 160 of these multi-organ procedures in the past 2 years. A local atty told me I am not alone in needing to sue, but even medical experts cannot decide which complication results from which procedure as they do so much. In my state (Mass) med mal attys don't get paid unless they win. So they are not apt to take cases that aren't iron clad guranteed of winning. I didn't uncover all these suits until I got a rep at our mass med board spring 2008 when I gathered info to write my claim or file my suit. The reps I got prior to my 2006 surgery did not know how to navigate their own data base as I was told there were no suits. All suits were dated prior to my 2006 surgery.
A prominent Boston Dr. consulted pre surgery also did not tell me he thought I had an inherent dysfunction of my pelvic floor. I found this in his notes I found out I could get After the fact. He had proposed lap sigmoid resection and removal of right ovary only. This made more sense, but then he quickly added "But this may not solve your incomplete rectal emptying problem" SO why would I have had surgery where the surgeon proposed surgery then quickly added, "But this may not work." Acccording to the tests I had per my med reviewers, I had perfectLY NORMAL pelvic muscle function (PRIOR to surgery). There was a lot of information that was not true nor complete. I've been beating myself up over my poor choice, but friends are helping me uncover more of what I wasn't told and more of what I was told that was untrue. I really did the right research, but fell into dishonest hands. The ileostomy saved my life, but the fear of repeat small bowel adhesions is what is really bothering me. But it's been 11 months and so far so good. The surgeon who finally helped me is tops in his field and went out on a limb politically to save my life. 11 other surgeons did nothing and were going to let me die as doing something would admit that the original 2 surgeons had screwed me up. If anyone is in desperate need of a great surgeon who puts patient lives over medical politics email me and I will give his name and
location. Without him I would be dead by now. Thanks for your replies. Write again. Sincerely, Rosemary email
[email protected]