Tom,
I am so sorry that you have been sick for so long. I can identify with you- I made some very bad and costly decisions in the past as well while to trying to get my daughter well.
Any time that you can gain reliable information that is useful to becoming well, it is a reall plus. I use to work for a clinical reference laboratory many years ago. I know of the usefulness of the wide array of tests that are available. I am not anti laboratory testing. The problem is the way that the modern conventional healthcare system works. A sick person presents to the physician with a set of symptoms. The physician consults his PDR, and/or pulls from his own resevoir of experience. He then orders what he thinks are the appropriate tests. There is some value in this method, but it is very limited when dealing with the extremely debilitated patients that lyme sufferers often are. First, doctor's that accept insurance often only order tests that they know that the insurance companies will pay for. Secondly, other than blood chemistry profiles, most of the tests are very narrow in scope, i.e. they are only testing for one thing, or a few things. The third problem is related to the second. A doctor is not going to order tests for every known pathogen, or tests for every possible vitamin, mineral, hormone, or enzyme in the body. They are not going to test the status of every organ in the body. Frankly, conventional medical pracitioners generally do not possess the tools to measure many of the dysfunctions that can occur in the body. I am not saying that many of the tools that they use for testing are not good ones. I am saying that they don't know what they don't know! It would be prohibitively expensive for a conventional practitioner to use every test that could be even remotely applicable from his toolkit. The fourth problem is that the tests that test for the presence of pathogens are often inaccurate.
There is a better way. It is a way that would confirm the validity of your clinical reference laboratory tests, and would in fact give a lot more informationn than those tests could ever provide. There is a type of testing that is based on frequency testing in the body. I am personally familiar with electro-dermal testing such as computronix and Asyra. I am also personally familiar with Dr. Jernigan's proprietary testing which he calls Bioresonance. You can gain a lot more accurate information from these bioenergetic tests than you can from the conventional tests, especially in areas that the conventional tests are weakest, such as in a situation such as yours. And this revealing testing information comes at a much much lower cost!
Heather was tested with the Asyra testing system three months before her Igenix Western Blot came back indeterminate. The Asyra test for Lyme revealed that she was positive for Borrelia Garinii, and had a high pathogrn count. Her Igenix test for Bartonella was negative. Her Asyra test for Bartonella was positive, and had a high pathogen count.
The testing results for Babesia was fascinating to me, and confirmed the vast superiority of bio-energetic testing. Heather was tested by the Asyra about
3 months before we found her first LLMD. When the LLMD told us what tests that she intended to test for, she said that she would test for Babesia Microti. She said that Babesia Duncani was not as common in Maryland, and that it would probably be a waste of money since we were already going to have to pay a lot for these tests. Remembering the Asyra tests from 3 months prior, I told her that the Asyra test for Babesia Microti was negative, but that it was positive for Babesia Duncani. She rolled her eyes and agreed to test for Babesia Duncani, but also insisted on testing for Babesia Microti. Can you guess what the test results were? The Igenix results came back negative for Babesia Microti and positive for Babesia Duncani. I can tell you that the LLMD was not happy with us telling her what to do, and being right!
We ended up taking Heather to the Hansa Center with Dr. J. He has developed his own proprietary testing method called Bioresonance. His testing is generations beyond the Computronix and Asyra, and can give a lot more information. His tests revealed that the Borrelia, Bartonella, and Babesia were still afflicting Heather. He also picked up that Heather had Erhlichiosis, West Nile Virus, and HHV6. That did not surprise me, as Heather had spent a lot of time outside the previous summer, as she was feeling somewhat better before she relapsed later. She had a lot of nasty misquito bites that took forever to heal. His testing also revealed a lot of other issues that most conventional medical practitioners wouldn't even think of.
I am not bashing LLMD's in general, because LLMD's such as Dietrich Klinghardt have state of the art testing capabilities. I am bashing the narrow scope of testing that many LLMD's limit themselves to. The most cost effective and illuminating thing that you could do is to find a healthcare practitioner that employs this type of testing. If you love your LLMD, then fine. You can still find an alternative healthcare practitioner that does this type of testing, to work with the LLMD. My experience is that various bioenergetic scans cost us $200-$300. As you know, $300 of conventional testing doesn't get very much information.
The bottom line is that it is all about
getting better within the financiall framework that we have to work with. I realize that this may be a new PATH for you, but this path may lead to the goals that you are seeking.
Don
Post Edited (Heathersdad) : 12/13/2012 10:10:40 PM (GMT-7)