Posted 10/14/2015 10:38 PM (GMT 0)
My toddler was bit by an Ixiodes Angustus tick in WA state 3 weeks ago. I sent the tick to the LMZ in the Universtity of MA to get tested and IDed, as well as the local department of health. The tick came back negative for all disease that species could carry by DNA testing.
However her leg is still looking horrible, even 3 weeks later. At first it was just the central red area but after 2 weeks, the outer red area started. Largest size was about a nickel. It hasn't grown in the last week. But it still looks so awful. I have brought her to the pediatrician twice. We tried a course of topical antibiotic ointment, though she didn't think it was infected. It had no effect. We didn't do oral antibiotics because it tested negative for disease. I contacted the LMZ and they say their tests are 100% accurate because they are DNA tests of the tick.
Does anyone have any ideas what is causing this skin reaction?
Wait, I can't post an image! How do I do that?