abhi,
I'm a bit of an outsider at his point as my daughter has long ago recovered from her chronic LD with approaches "outside of the box." I'm now an observer that contributes only occasionally. This is one of the occasions when I just can't remain silent.
I want to congratulate you for thinking outside of the box! Should you do a 10 day water fast? Your peers claim to know enough about
water fasting and your personal situation to confidently say "NO"! I will say that I don't know, but I want to tell you a few things to consider when making your decision.
I have personally greatly benefited from 22 and 23 day water fasts. It is capable of facillitating the body to make improvements or corrections that no other approach can touch. Since Buhner is respected on this forum, take a look at what he has to say:
http://www.gaianstudies.org/articles4.htm
Buhner doesn't mentioned Lyme Disease in this article, but has suggested caution in other articles when questioned about
whether those with LD should consider doing it. I have never seen an instance where he talks about
the results for a person with LD who has tried water fasting. I also saw an article in a question and answer in which he said that he wished that he had included the topic of fasting in his book.
People with many different types of long term debilitating illness have been helped or cured of their illness or condition, including LD, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, some cancers, psoriasis, severe acne, etc. etc. It's fact,and has been well documented by physicians and patient testimonies.
Water fasting is one of the most powerful treatment approaches available, but is it appropriate for all? The answer is no. Here is an article that summarizes some of the things to consider:
http://www.allabout
fasting.com/water-fasting.html
Please know that the vast majority of physicians are completely ignorant about
the benefits of water fasting,and will rubber stamp a flat NO. In addition the average LLMD also is not qualified or informed about
fasting. They are difficult to find, but you must find a fasting-literate physician to monitor you. You may desire to go to a fasting center staffed with MD's that are qualified to consider your situation. TrueNorth Health Center is such a place:
http://www.healthpromoting.com/
The real issue is whether your body is already so debilitated that a water fast would be contraindicated. Our well meaning friends in this thread have shared their opinions, but a good fasting-literate physician would be best qualified to make that determination.
Here is the approach that I would take. First you need to be cleared by a qualified physician. Scientific studies have shown that even a short 3 day water fast yields tremendous benefits. If you find yourself desiring to do a water fast, I would first do a 3-4 day fast. Since you will dump more toxins during this period than you ever have in your life, you will need to assist your body by employing several detoxing methods. You don't want to be dragging all of those toxins through impaired kidneys or liver. If you respond well to the short fast, you may desire to to do a longer fast a month or two later to obtain even more benefits.
Several erroneous statements have been made in this thread. I want to address them individually.
It's not necessarily true that something must be eaten every day. I personally know several sick people that have eaten no food for 40 or more days. Short fasts are often undertaken by even very sick people with great results. That can only be determined by a qualified physician.
I can not find any prohibition of fasting for mycoplasma. Water fasting generally clears infections from lungs. I know this from experience. There is no logical reason why water fasting would exacerbate mycoplasma.
A person that is fasting does not necessarily suffer from lack of nutrition. During fasting nutrition is obtained from fat and nonself and non living structures such as scar tissue, cysts, tumors, plaque, parasites, protozoans, bacteria, and viruses. Your body will digest these things.
A short fast does not necessarily produce dangerous electrolyte levels. Even if you develop low levels it is easy to take electrolytes without interfering with the fast. I monitored my blood pressure and pulse rate. I took electrolytes when my blood pressure and pulse were lower than optimal. This is the easiest thing to manage! If I can manage it, I"m sure that a qualified physician would manage it even better!
Water fasting improves immune function- contrary to what has been suggested in this thread! When a person is fasting and in a resting state, the debilitated immune system is supercharged and "reset".
https://news.usc.edu/63669/fasting-triggers-stem-cell-regeneration-of-damaged-old-immune-system/
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/12/11/neuroscientist-shows-what-fasting-does-to-your-brain-why-big-pharma-wont-study-it/
Does it surprise anyone that the best information is often from patient testimony. I have come across a lot of people during the last several years that insisted that water fasting was the approach that cured them from chronic LD. Here are a few that I found right now:
https://www.tylertolman.com/testimonials/ (third patient testimony down)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Yen68JQOA4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET8zRbzYsYg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpOlOSczZEc (sound quality is poor,sections are unintelligible, her summary of the entire experience is intelligible at 6:00.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLfD8dHuO-M
http://www.mdjunction.com/forums/protomyxzoa-rheumatica-discussions/general-support/11023980-im-doing-a-water-fast-to-heal-myself
There are plenty of other people that have illnesses such as chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, etc. that have been helped/cured by water fasting as well. We all know that many of these people really have LD. You can research those patient testimonies on your own.
Water fasting definitely is not for everyone, but it is for a lot of people. Abhi- it may be the single best thing that you have ever done for yourself. If I was you, I would contact LD patients that have done it, as well as physicians at fasting centers that would be familiar with LD and fasting. I have long ago learned that the majority is often wrong- even in LD forums!
I am not saying that you are a candidate for a short water fast, but rather that it is certainly worth investigating. I just don't think that a bunch of fasting-illiterate sick people saying NO is adequate when considering the matter. I am disagreeing with a few "veteran" members here that have otherwise helped a lot of people with sound information. Nevertheless if I had heeded the "consensus" opinion when considering the treatment approach that ultimately healed my daughter, she would still be just as sick as everyone else.
In short, the presuppositions expressed in this thread are just plain wrong. Caution? Yes!!!.... Paralysis? No!!!
Hopefully I haven't offended anyone with my strong but civil disagreement.
Don
Post Edited (Heathersdad) : 10/10/2016 1:24:34 AM (GMT-6)