Hi, I'm back and conscious. Some excellent news -
My son got his peripheral vision back over the weekend. I don't know how, but the '3rd eye doc' was testing him and I could see that my son's range was much better! YAY YAY YAY! (The flip side being the doc says it is impossible for the problem to have existed since there's no damage to the eye and the MRI was negative.)
So, he has his vision but there is NO explanation for nearly six weeks of partial blindness. The doc did object when I asked if he was saying my son lied about it, but it still was "impossible". No idea that maybe the radiologist missed something, or that the issue doesn't show? Biochemical signaling?
The only changes there were, were dietary. I started him back up on omega 3s for a week after running out for a while, added a multi vitamin we'd been out of, and gave him lots of cherries. Doesn't seem like a likely cause, but who knows. No one at the doctors'.
You know, the Munchausen thing is pretty fn scary isn't it? If I don't advocate for my son, or if I refuse to get him treatment when he's sick then I would be being neglectful, but push too hard and then they can make a darn sticky diagnosis and splat - tarred and feathered in one quick claim. (No proof neccessary, no false positives!)
The money problem means I'll have to rely on certain friendly resources for a lawyer's aid. I don't have the means for a battle, even though there's such clear evidence. I'm really only trying to get the basic CDC minimum of 21 days abx at this point - to get him started. He's never had a full prescription. I'm not claiming chronic Lyme, I'm claiming untreated Lyme. Step one.
I know they won't change their minds - they'd lose face and admit to error. One doc recently was surprised when I suggested she looked up Columbia U's site to see a listing of some studies which show neg tests do not mean no Bb. Her bro in law teaches there. Hmm. Maybe one little seed of curriosity will grow and push open a shutter in her mind. And I didn't suggest Quacks R Us.
I get partly annoyed, and partly satisfied when someone poohpoohs some info I have and I can tell them "Oh, that's from the CDC" or "That's from the state Health Department" or some other source which they can't belittle without weakening their own point.
California has a law protecting doctors and patients allowing me to go to an LLMD and get treatment but it doesn't pay for it! The payment help I've seen, mostly thanks to you, Traveler :) , want me to show I don't have ins. to cover the Lyme. I think I have just about proved that by now.
Another Q - what's the basic antibiotic for Bartonella? Is there one that does Bart and Bor.? Amoxi is what he was given, for only 10 days; doxy is a problem for tooth staining til 8 yrs old. Some include 8 some say until 8. Is there a decent test for Bart? People here have shown me reasons to think it may be a prob. too.
I don't want to use my boy's name because I want to give him some privacy but it feels weird always saying 'my son' and not his name!
He hated the eye drops to dialate his eyes, they hurt a lot. He had a complete melt down, hide in the corner when they tried to put in two more. I tried to hold him still and it turned into a 3 ring circus. It was traumatic for him.
Finally it was decided he'd be ok with just the first drop. But, at the end the doc said if you have any more trouble then come back, maybe we'll need more eye drops. Sound like a c..py thing to say? Let's make sure he doesn't tell me if there's a problem!
OK, I've been at this too long tonight. I have a few other messages to look at before I go to sleep again. Goodnight, and thank-you again for everything.