I'm so sorry, as with those doses, it will likely relapse. Early treatment is essential, but you still have to have the proper dosages or you are only "using a fly swatter on a bull".
Maybe you would consider using an herbal protocol along with your abx??? Many here do both like that, and it would help you tremendously in your healing.
And if you had a value of 91 and it says that 0 - 90 is negative,
and the same with the Lyme Disease Ab. Your result was (if I'm reading that right) 80, and the range is 0 -79. How did she come to the conclusion that they are negative???? No matter what you are talking about
, if 0 - 79 is negative, and you come up with 80, you're infected.
You can't be "a little bit infected" any more than a woman can only be a little bit pregnant. Either you are or you aren't. If she's treating you for Lyme, you might as well get the treatments that will be a lot more likely to prevent relapses.
And the thing is she used the ELISA - which misses 70% of those who are actually infected with Lyme. This leads me to believe she is definitely treating you according to Infectious Disease Society's standards - which they believe that Lyme is hard to catch and easy to treat.
Before you go any further with this doctor, you might want to read these articles. They will help explain the differences between the two standards of care from a few different specialties, not ILADS even:
This one lays the ground work and explains things quite well:
www.clinicaladvisor.com/controversy-continues-to-fuel-the-lyme-war/article/117160/This one is from an Internal Medicine magazine:
archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=226373And this one is from the National Institute of Health:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901226/