Hi Moe -
I totally agree w/ Girlie about
the interpretation and the context she provided. Very good analysis.
I also wanted to throw this out there... I've heard a couple of well-known LLMDs state this and my LLMD and my LL-gastro echo'd the same sentiment and I'm agreeing w/ it more and more: I think MOST people have lyme and there are reasons why some react to the infections w/ symptoms and some people don't. And these tests are simply a (very, very archaic and ineffective) formality that the medical industry and insurance companies need because there is so little understood about
lyme.
Some people have a DNA-predisposition to manage the lyme infection well, some people don't. I don't know if there have been studies done regarding the other coinfections, but I'd bet there is a similar DNA-like response. Also, people walk around in various states of health and this will affect how you manifest the infection. Some people (like me) suffered for decades because I was told it was fibro, CFS, MS, stress, all in my head. So for that time period, I "didn't have lyme"--in fact, doing the math, I'd bet that most people who have symptoms associated w/ lyme & coinfections haven't yet been diagnosed and aren't in treatment. There are other reasons why some people get sick, some don't.
But I like that your MD might focus more on the coinfections because what really matters MUCH much more than test results are your symptoms and that is what drives most clinical diagnoses and treatment. I think that is a good sign about
your MD (even though we disagree with this interpretation of your lyme test).
-p
Post Edited (Pirouette) : 4/28/2016 7:57:02 PM (GMT-6)