This article goes one step further, or actually, several steps back. Why blame deer (as a the host), when the issue starts with field mice, and the lack of animals (fox) hunting them now.
Ive read several places that fox have been pushed out of habitat from coyotes, which increased from lack of wolves in the last 50 years. BUT northern MN has the largest increase in timber-wolf population in the US, (I've snowmobiled thru packs of them), YET........... lyme continues to spread into the northern MN forests from.......... central MN. Guess they didnt study MN then. Southern Ontario Canada (just above MN), I would imagine has a similar patern of more wolves AND more lyme. Both areas have thin human populations in the forested areas, so there is more lyme than people to infect - not much to report about
.
........."Where foxes thrive, Lyme disease doesn't , September 10, 2012 New York, Poughkeepsie Journal
... Taal Levi has studied environments from Brazil to Alaska ... His statistical analysis showed little correlation between the prevalence of deer and the incidence of Lyme. If that were the case, Levi said, “then why is Lyme disease so relatively rare in Western New York when deer are more abundant than in places here that have lots of Lyme disease?” ...Levi used statistical data to show that as fox populations went down, Lyme went up. The statistical connection between Lyme and other species wasn’t as consistent. The study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in June... "
www.deerfriendly.com/lyme-diseasePost Edited (astroman) : 5/1/2016 9:24:33 PM (GMT-6)