happyjo said...
Some patients may be helped with 1 abx @ a time -I know this is contrary to what most forum advise. But this doc letting you lose without continuing any abx-baaah!
Maybe there is an undertow exerting legal pressure on this doc? Or maybe this doc just plain sux!! pmm~so sry u went thru this! I know how emotional & traumatic it can be!
Is there a link showing who were former ILADS presidents? That shoud be permitted, no?
She basically said that because I just have Lyme and no coinfection, more than one abx wasn't necessary. But when I questioned her about
the accuracy of coinfection testing, she dodged the issue. She did say that anaplasmosis is the most common coinfection in NJ...have to look that up as well.
As far as legal pressure....she is currently involved with a clinical trial at a NY University (not sure if I can mention it?). Part of me thinks she is tailoring her current treatment to support that trial whether or not the patient is enrolled in it. Ethical? No, but it makes the most sense. (I had professors in grad school who did the same thing with their classes.)
I also tried to look up previous ILADS officers...no luck. Trying hard not to obsess over this lol It's got me curious as to what is really going on!