Well, I figured out part of my issue with my revised ileostomy stoma. The reason it looks as though part of my stoma collapsed and grew onto my skin is because I have something called mucosal seeding. It is caused by an ileostomy stoma being made without a subcuticular stitching when the stoma is matured (formed). It actually is viable stoma which is grown out onto the skin. Just like what I was describing and as seen in pictures I sent to Tracy and Christine.
SO that is one thing that was done wrong in the revision. There is this other issue that was a bit more complex that I also have that I think is what is impeding the flow of stool. The stoma kind of goes in at night and sticks out and is very stiff during the day. And the
opening is like on the side of it rather than in the middle of it. That explanation in the textbook was beyond my comprehension but it is something important, obviously.
The colorectal surgery book I found this in (Identical pic to my malformed new stoma) also said that attempts at trying to cauterize off the part of the stoma that is flat on my skin are futile. It also says that some skin flat thing can also be done to cover the part of the stoma that has "grown onto the skin" but that the mucosal seeding can recur. SO that is what Dr. S was trying to do when he put the silver nitrate on that flattened part of my stoma. They were all calling it granuloma's there at Mt. S when I KNEW and told them that it was actual stoma material.
The textbook said that this can make pouching very difficult and lead to skin breakdown which I sure have. The part where the stoma goes in when lying down and comes out when sitting and standing is in there too. Wish I could understand that part BUT upshot is this revision was done incorrectly. INTERESTING the textbook chapter was written by my original stoma surgeon (now retired) who did make me a perfect stoma back in 2007. The fact that it stenosed this March I really do not think was his fault. I only weighed 99 lbs when he made it and I think if he had
opened my abdominal wall 2 fingerbreadths wide, it may have prolapsed as my op report said I had "very little accompanying fat".
SO I figured it out. The book said that sometimes re
location of the stoma is needed with all this going on. I am going to copy the pages and bring them with me out west when I go. This stoma redo absolutely HAS to work or I will die. I am going to ask about
what is up with the stoma having the
opening on the side with the mucosal seeding. Maybe lack of subcuticular stitching makes not only the mucosal seeing but may make the stoma crooked too and compromise the ability to output.
I know the doc who did the revision meant well as the current doc where I had been was totally ignoring my severe stenosis March thru May, so it is as it is and he certainly TRIED to help. BUT don't they teach how to do these stoma's in surgery school?
It sounded like the unevenness issue with the stoma and the off centered lumen was due to not enough bowel being freed up to make the stoma. I do have ten tons of adhesions and it was likely difficult to lyse so many lapro. I hope the doc out west will be able to do this (free up enough intestine). SO i was right right along, this new stoma was not made correctly (though I know well intentioned). One doc in NY (not mt s) thru his nurse said "Don't think about
your stoma so much." Well no I would be back cruising if it worked well and was normal. THAT was the thing that really made me dig for this info. When someone says that it means there is something wrong. All the answers were in this huge colorectal surgery textbook I got hold of.
Post Edited (esoR) : 8/26/2012 11:15:15 PM (GMT-6)