Good luck in your future testings, deja vu words..., the doc said it was "contained"(or I got it all), that is his opinion(which is empirically an unknown assessment and could be incorrect) and it is stated flatty to many a patient no matter what stats they might have been found with. If they could be legally held to the words, few would be in practice today...countless patients have found it was afterall not contained or doc did not get it all.
Get tested as often as you wish, but with a gleason 8 found (remember biopsies are hit and miss and you can have various Gleasons scores found within your gland(I had 7,8,9's)...in other words a patient can have a gleason 9 or 10 even and it was missed via biopsy(since they can miss plenty) or the pathologists if not one of the reknown experts could easily mis-read a Gleason 8 whereby upon review it might be a 9 or such). What it means is stay vigilant for years on your testings regardless of if your doc says you are even cured within 1- 2 yrs. of safe tests, after maybe 10 yrs. of clear psa tests then start thinking you may be cured.
Gleason 8, 9, 10 are associated with high risk patients in general. PCa is more of the the twlight zone, than black and white. Might not be what anyone wishes to be the reality of PCa, but it is what it is.
Another variable is "micro mets" or because of perinueral invasion from your prostate it is possible to have PCa somewhere else and go undetectable for years. There are cases of patient whom did not relapse or were looking clear for 10 yrs., and then find PCa show up elsewhere, even with clean pathology post surgery, etc. Dr. Barken has commented upon this so called phenomenon. I doubt he is on drugs in making his assessment, the patients exist out there to prove this.
Post Edited (zufus) : 8/15/2009 7:41:13 PM (GMT-6)