clocknut said...
I was greatly surprised by that. At 88g, I thought my risk of future problems would be greater, not smaller, but there it is, in black and white, suggesting that a larger prostate can pose less risk. Weird. It's a six-year-old study, though, so may no longer be relevant? At 337g, yours must have been the size of a grapefruit!
Yikes, I spoke in jest, and attempted to cite a gland size that would clearly be ridiculous. At 337g, I thought "softball" size, a grapefruit is similar.
What was the prize I now must forfeit?