Posted 2/22/2012 1:00 AM (GMT 0)
Sonny,
Too bad there wasn't a prize on your PSA score, shucks, my guess was right in there with your number. One thing my onologist is hoping for, and perhaps you are seeing this in your own number, is that despite our rapid climbs to the high altitudes, that at some point the PSA will start to level off from the steep climbs. This is what he is hoping for me on my next reading in April.
We talked a lot about micromets on my last visit. He is still of the opinion, that once the cancer has escaped the prostate bed, the remaining cells could be in 1 location, or 5, or 50, or a hundred. He feels that the PSA readings are showing a cumlative total of course, but no one site is biggest enough to detect with any of the scans that are out there.
This is why he's not paritcually concerned about my exact number, which was 14.0 last time, because if its the results of mutiple sites, then no one of them will get picked up with the scan. This is why he told me, that he had men with post secondary treatment BCR PSA's as high as 100 with no evidence of mets. Why, and no some are tired of the expression, he doesn't treat a "number", he treats the overall condition of the patient. It is also why he's not eager to start me on HT or chemo at this point, though neither are ruled off the table if reality changes at some point.
That way, he says, I can preserve a better QOL for as long as possible, and hold off on any future advanced treatments until they are really needed.
Hope you get home safe. Sounds like Lynn was in safe hands while you were gone.
David in SC
P.S. This why in the end, my last special PET scan was canceled, and also why my doctor was not eager for me to undergo the tests that you have been doing in D.C. He just felt that at this time, it wouldnt show him anything useful, or change any treatment issues for me right now.