142: My CT scan is "With I.V., Oral Contrast," thus the milkshake beforehand, I guess.
DavidG: Yes, Dr. P. it is. I haven't spoken to any other surgeons. I have personal reasons for wanting to be at that particular hospital, and Dr. P. is the RARP leader there. He's also my regular uro.
Re the CT scan, I suspect it's the Gleason of 3+4 that drove the decision. I say this because the original Bx report came back as a 3+3, and the doc said no need for any scans. Then, when a re-read of the Bx report came back at 3+4, the doc decided on the scans. That's the only thing that changed.
Jonathan: Catching up on "prostate-related" activities, huh? Ya mean, like standing over the flippin' toilet for eternity, waiting and waiting and waiting, and then repeating the same in a short time, again and again.
Jim: I did meet with a radiation oncologist, and was actually rather impressed with him. Coincidentally, the very next day, I received news that my Bx report had been revised from a Gleason 3+3 to a Gleason 3+4, and my wife (who's an oncology nurse) and I agreed that the "get it out" approach, with the opportunity to examine the nodes, seemed the wisest course.
Thanks to all of you for your input!