Msworrywart should be my name!! The same thing happened to my husband as yours. Because of a family history his GP said to start his PSA at 44, it showed 3.9. Now with the lab results it showed like it was just peaking the normal range and was mixed in with all of his other blood work so we never gave it a second glance. I never even knew what a PSA meant a year ago. His GP should know more about
age and PSA's, maybe an 80 year old man would have that kind of PSA, but not at 44. I am greatful that the same GP did call him about
his 4.9 level this year and didn't just write that off as a little above normal!! Doug's Uro said he has probably had this for 3 years or so. I think 40 is a good start date to check PSA when there is a family history.
I have three little kids with not much time to read, actually one is home with me now with a fever :(. It might be nice for Doug to skim through a book, if time allows it. Doctor Patrick Walsh's guide to surviving prostate cancer I have heard is a good one. Do you have it msworrywart? See Doug is not like me. I want the darn thing out, though I do want to talk with some other doctors about alternatives. This is not me we are talking about though, so it's his decision. Doug is more of the I want to get rid of it but, I don't like the surgery idea, let's see what the other options are. His manhood means too much to him. I see that quite a few younger men are not (as prone) to the harsher side effects of surgery. Everyone is different though. He has been discussing this with some of his customers and PA is so common. He said everyone seems to say either I had it, or my brother had it or my uncle etc. He's getting a lot of different ideas from people that's for sure. I just don't want it to spread with a treatement that didn't really work. We do know now that life goes on and nothing changes, you just have to fit this into the mix. Things could be worse.