Hi Irmaly,
Just cutting and pasting what I may be able to respond to. You asked for encouragement... . Your hubby's PSA was 3.9 and rose to 5.2 (with negative DRE) in about 5 months you said? This is probably the Gleeson 7 acting out, and I think you are correct to be treating it seriously (we did too). My hubby had same scenario but not as widespread 5 years ago, as he was 20 years younger (48 at the time) than your hubby. The initial biopsy showed a 4 + 3. We sought second and third opinions and learnt of the multifocal nature of Pca, even though it was not showing on the biopsy (one core of 5% 4 + 3 plus PIN was showing only), and we learnt about the unpredictable nature of a gleeson 7. We asked the hard questions of everyone, and eventually found a nerve-sparing surgeon with lots of experience. Following surgery, our suspicions were correct, and there were several areas not picked up at biopsy which would have eventually spread. However it was down-graded to 3 + 4 overall.
This all happened 5 years ago, and my husband has now made a full recovery for which we are grateful.
What I am saying in essence is that it is quite likely with the rise from 3.9 to 5.2 and your fast and sure action, and consultation, that whatever decision you make, you have probably caught it in time - namely contained within the prostate itself. The blunt-speaking doctor may be talking about taking wider margins to ensure this containment - Get a second opinion on that - The nature of the gleeson 7 may mean that this is recommended, but for peace of mind, seek a second surgical opinion too, while you are checking out radiation. Both these options are for pca contained within the prostate. The fact that your hubby is in excellent physical health is great, and the fact you are both fighters is a bonus. But you may be lucky like us, and therefore whatever option you choose you seem to have caught it... and you, like us may prefer to aim at 20 years rather than just the ten! The seeds doctor will have an opinion on all this too - make sure you ask that doc too, and compare and contrast, and question their answers.
Your surgical doctor sounds experienced. If he is, he may not mind you seeking a second opinion privately if you need to, but if he does, just don't tell him. We spoke to several doctors, and did our research like you. We did end up finding someone both kind and competent. I know it is a minor issue really, compared to the advise they give, but I really can't stand rude and insensitive doctors. I have met many, and it is not necessary. Just make sure his attitude is not because he is bored with his work and starting to treat people as a 'pattern' rather than individually. You have the right with such life changing information (about side effects) to seek a quick opinion, and then discuss with your primary doctor. If he is not willing to do that, he may not have your best interests at heart. If he has a good reason to not spare the nerves due to margins issues and the possibility of spread, then he owes you a detailed explanation whatever his normal manner.
Hope this helps. The worst thing is the uncertainty. You are doing all the right things to resolve it. Then question I would be asking now is, is he planning to take the lymph nodes to just routine check and biopsy (this is quite common) or is he concerned about the lymph nodes in terms of potential spead right now, and if so, why? My hubby was told the same thing - as it turned out lymphs were fine. I don't think they can check this beforehand other than just other scans etc.
It is scary but you asked for encouragement. Just a few ideas to give you that maybe. You have to have hope... but I do think, reading you hubby's stat's and situation that you can have some hope here, regardless of what you both decide in the end. You are dong all the right things. Keep in touch with the guys (& gals) here and they can support you all the way, each step of the way. Good luck & kind regards, Lana