Camerabug,
With your husband's data, you treatment choices would seem to come down to:
surgery + immediate (Adjunct) radiation + hormones. (This would be the most aggressive approach possible).
surgery + immediate (Adjunct) radiation without hormones.
surgery alone.
radiation with hormones.
radiation alone.
The choices probably come down to the doctors you will choose. With a Gleason 8 present in at least one tissue (and don't assume the others will stay at a 7), that would argue for an aggressive approach. Put another way. Your husband's cancer has already announced itself as aggressive. A new major study out of Europe (reported October 2012 Lancet medical journal) shows real benefit to immediate radiation (Adjunct) after surgery to men at high risk, as opposed to waiting for biochemical failure down the road (Salvage Radiation). Of high risk men who receive immediate radiation, 61% are Progression Free for five years after surgery; only 39% of those who wait to receive Salvage Radiation see the same results over five years. Randomized study included 1005 high risk men over a period of 10+ years.
Best wishes to you and husband!
Newspaper Lover
Age 68
DaVinci surgery 11/09. Clean margins, clean seminal vessels.
Rising PSA noted 06/11
Gleason 8
Time to recurrrence 18 months
Three month doubling time (summer 2011).
PSA rose from .07 on 06/11 to .17 on 11/11.
MRIs and bone scans negative so far.
Started hormone therapy (Lupron/Casodex) 12/11
Began radiation (SRT) 02/20/12.
Finished SRT 04/16/12
Last Lupron shot 03/12
PSA and testostorone "undetectable" 07/12
Next PSA and testostorone test early January