Posted 5/31/2013 5:14 AM (GMT 0)
Hi canuk77,
It would be great if the first biopsy report (Gleason 4+3) turns out to be more accurate than the second one at 5+3. A Gleason grade of 4 is aggressive, but not nearly as aggressive as a 5.
Without being certain which might be more accurate (I would imagine the second one is), I would not waste much time getting started with whatever treatment he decides on.
You are wise for looking into all available forms of treatment. As a layman, and a (hopefully former!) patient, I often lean toward surgery because removal of the prostate "could" eliminate all of the cancer all at once. If there are any remaining cancer cells, salvage radiation could follow up on it to hopefully finish off any remaining cancer cells -- if they are still confined to the general area of the prostate bed.
Even if cancer is found in the tissue customarily removed with the prostate (extraprostatic soft tissue, seminal vesicles, etc), the surgery can still possibly give a cure. And younger patients generally recover more fully (in terms of ED) than older guys.
You should, if possible, consult with both radiation oncologists AND urologist/surgeons to get their opinions and learn the pros and cons of ALL available forms of treatment.
I'm not sure (others here can tell you), but I think that there can be ED problems even with radiation. So you should ask about that.
Naturally, you should try to do this in the immediate future so that whatever treatment is ultimately chosen can be started.
Sure am wishing you the very best!
Chuck
Resident of Highland, Indiana just outside of Chicago, IL.
July 2011 local PSA lab reading 6.41 (from 4.1 in 2009). Mayo Clinic PSA Sept. 2011 was 5.7.
Local urologist DRE revealed significant BPH, but no lumps.
PCa Dx Aug. 2011 at age of 61.
Biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma in 3 of 20 cores (one 5%, two 20%). T2C.
Gleason score 3+3=6.
CT of abdomen, bone scan both negative.
DaVinci prostatectomy 11/1/11 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), nerve sparing, age 62.
My surgeon was Dr. Matthew Tollefson, who I highly recommend.
Final pathology shows tumor confined to prostate.
5 lymph nodes, seminal vesicles, extraprostatic soft tissue all negative.
1.0 x 0.6 x 0.6 cm mass involving right posterior inferior,
right posterior apex & left mid posterior prostate.
Right posterior apex margin involved by tumor over a 0.2 cm length, doctor says this is insignificant.
Prostate 98.3 grams, tumor 2 grams. Prostate size 5.0 x 4.7 x 4.5 cm.
Abdominal drain removed the morning after surgery.
Catheter out in 7 days. No incontinence, occasional minor dripping.
Post-op exams 2/13/12, 9/10/12, PSA <0.1. PSA tests now annual.
Semi-firm erections now happening 14 months post-op & VERY slowly getting a bit stronger.