daig7,
I really admire your attitude and your conviction to take charge of your own health decisions and not just follow the old paternalistic model.
With your small focus of GS 3+4, and I would have that confirmed by Bostwick or Epstein if you haven't already, ALL options are
open to you. That includes Active Surveillance if you are on a program that does periodic confirmations with an mpMRI or CDUS. I know that UCLA is allowing men in with GS 3+4 because of their excellent mpMRI capability, and Scholz/Lam/Turner is taking men with GS 3+4 because he now does CDUS (although I would feel more comfortable with readings by Lee, Bahn or Ukimura).
You may be interested in the following analysis:
Can Contemporary Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 3+4 Be Eligible for Active Surveillance?
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F
10.1371%2F
journal.pone.0109031
Another possibility which may be of interest to you is focal therapy - I'm very interested in IRE, which has just started clinical trials.
Everything else will work too: SBRT, both kinds of brachytherapy, and even the new pencil beam proton - all worth learning about
.
Post Edited (Tall Allen) : 10/4/2014 11:01:04 AM (GMT-6)