I posted this in another thread a few months back; it bears repeating here:
In March 2013 the Reuters news service published an
investigation into CTCA (which is a for-profit enterprise), looking at how it comes up with its survival statistics and how it selects the patients it treats. The lead reporter is a longtime science/health writer and editor and knows her stuff.
A member of an oral cancer community where I've been active for several years (husband had OC; I've been lurking here because my brother-in-law was diagnosed with PC) also noted that while CTCA does offer conventional therapies, the highly promoted add-ons (naturopathy, etc.) may not be covered by insurance -- so presumably those costs would come out of your pocket.
Post Edited (Bluepencil) : 4/21/2015 7:34:26 AM (GMT-6)