PDA said...
JackH: Huh??
PDA, you need additional words…? Here's appropriate background:
• Before you clarified that Deebo has previously received treatment, I commented that many cases initially diagnosed with 3+4 may not need treatment at all (at least in the short term).
• Wilderness commented today that “…we cannot yet discriminate those [aggressive] cases” which I took to be in direct response to my comments. Wilderness implied that some comments (perhaps mine) were “too certain.”
• The fact is that we can and do properly discriminate between those cases today, and have been able to do so for some time. For those favorable-risk patients who choose not to seek immediate treatment, they will typically be prescribed a second, confirmatory biopsy and/or mpMRI about 12 months after initial diagnosis to weed-out aggressive cases needing treatment.
• The failure rates (and mortality) of those favorable-risk cases seeking immediate treatment is virtually the same as than those who defer treatment until after readings change to unfavorable.
So, an implication that the suggestion that Deebo may be a candidate for a conservative approach was somehow “ironic” (possibly as a stand-in phrase for “inappropriate”) fails to standup to the practiced and published results of medical professionals today.
Every day, someone like Deebo who may have been initially diagnosed with favorable-risk case gets successfully weeded out of conservative management approaches into a deferred and appropriate treatment.
Too many men for whom it would be appropriate, however, don’t give conservative management a chance to work for them and they (over)react quickly to their emotions, rather than the data. “Cancer” can be an emotional term in our society, but many prostate cancer cases truly do not need treatment. Overtreatment continues to this day…
Turns out not to have been the case with Deebo.