I think the days when health care professionals can avoid questions they don't want to answer and just brush people off with a "radiation is radiation" response are over.
Information is too readily available and you can easily reference studies showing differences in efficacy and side effects with different radiation procedures. Tall Allen often links to these.
There may be reasons why your condition dictates for or against a particular procedure (I know someone who would prefer SBRT, but they are not a good candidate for it) but for a doctor to just imply all procedures are equally good is just wrong.
John_TX said...
I wouldn't limit your radiation choices to just SBRT. My urologist at MD Anderson said "radiation is radiation" when I asked about the different varieties. My salvage radiation was IMRT at MD Anderson. If I was going to go the radiation route as first treatment, it would have been brachytherapy (seeds.)