Uncle Harley said...
I've been told sbrt is for low risk. I'm now intermediate.
You were misinformed. As you can see in the link below, the cure rate using SBRT for intermediate risk men was 97%, which is as high or higher than any other therapy. There are also some links in my signature.
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/09/5-year-sbrt-trial-high-cancer-control.htmlUncle Harley said...
Or at least hypofractionated IMRT? Is that something that would be discussed on a 1st visit w/ ro?
Yes, it is. Just ask if he offers "moderate hypofractionation." "Moderate" means it is done in 19-30 treatments. (SBRT, done in 4 or 5 treatments, would be called "extreme hypofractionation." "Fraction" means treatment.) In the last couple of years, it has been proven to be preferable to conventionally fractionated IMRT (40-44 treatments) - it is less wear and tear on the patient, and costs a lot less too. You can read about
it at the link below:
/prostatecancerinfolink.net/2017/06/22/eighth-randomized-clinical-trial-of-hypofractionated-radiation-therapy/ROs may be reluctant to offer it because it is different from the way they have always done it, and because they are reimbursed by Medicare/Insurance by the number of treatments. Some will see their revenues cut in half if hypofractionation is widely adopted.
If you have a choice between SBRT and moderate hypofractionation, my opinion is that fewer treatments is better. There was an interesting study comparing the two that you can read about
in the link below:
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/12/sbrt-vs-moderate-hypofractionation-same.html