I was curious about
how much of the tissue is looked at under the microscope by the pathologists. Do they slice it and exam all of it. When I did a search I could not find very much info on what they actually do, but I did find some studies that dealt with the subject of whether it was useful to go to the extra expense and time of examining "all" of tissue or just selected segments (the usual practice). So I got the impression that they don't look at all of it based on some statistics that gave correct results for most cases. By the way, the studies found that in examining all of the tissue compared to selected segments of the tissue that there were some cases where the Gleason score was under graded. I did the search a while back and I don't have the links to the studies and I don't remember exactly what phrase I used for the google search. I will ask my doctor the next time I see him but does anyone know something about
this or are there some pathologists out there that can explain how they determine what part of the tissue is examined ?
Post Edited (north alabama) : 3/6/2010 11:25:15 PM (GMT-7)