HealingWell
Search Close Search
☰

Bob Dillon was right. "Everybody must get ston?d!" LOL

Support Forums
>
Prostate Cancer
✚ New Topic locked
❬ ❬ Previous Thread |Next Thread ❭ ❭
Posted 4/1/2011 8:46 PM (GMT 0)
 

National Institute of Cancer says so to.............

http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/health-and-fitness/23146-national-institutes-of-cancer-website-recognizes-cancer-killing-properties-of-cannabinoids.html

Post Edited (ChrisR) : 4/1/2011 2:51:06 PM (GMT-6)

Posted 4/1/2011 8:49 PM (GMT 0)
Your post is probably in violation of Forum Rule #2. You might want to check it out first.
Posted 4/1/2011 8:49 PM (GMT 0)
What? Quoting song lyrics?
Posted 4/1/2011 8:54 PM (GMT 0)

ChrisR said...
What? Quoting song lyrics?

I'm in a MMJ legal state and I'm not allowed to discuss it here. Although as a preventative it doesn't work as my 40+ years of usage can attest to.
Posted 4/1/2011 9:22 PM (GMT 0)
Guys,
i have seen some interesting papers on this topic but they are not allowed here. The thing is not all states allow any use and federally it is outlawed for any use. I have alerted the Admin for a clarification. Similar to other topics we limit it is quite controversial.

I request that we await the findings before any further posting but I have a good idea on what the finding might be. And I'm sorry but it is what it is and we can move on.

Tony
Posted 4/2/2011 12:32 AM (GMT 0)
It's coming soon to Nevada, Tony. You'll be able to discuss, compare or whatever about MMJ at your Ustoo meetings then log online and be forbidden to say a word.

Seems rather silly and not current with the times. I don't find this topic to be the same as religion or politics.
Posted 4/2/2011 1:30 AM (GMT 0)
Ziggy this may dismay you.

I agree. And Nevada is on the cutting edge side of the topic btw.

I will only say we already have had this topic discussed at other meetings. But the rules here are different than the meetings we have and I also moderate them.

We have to respect the rules in place. If they change I will work for the patient as best I can within the parameters set to moderate.

I have to.

Tony
Posted 4/2/2011 1:41 PM (GMT 0)
I did not post this artilce to be controversial.   If you read the article they institute seems to elude that they actually believe it has a benefit, but then they back off as if they know it is very controversial.  I personally have never used, but it if will help others here or myself one day I don't want the it to be a hidden solution.   I think just like many other possible medicines that could beneift us, the drug companies don't want anything to do with it because it won't make them a "dime".   Oops, another pun again.......
Posted 4/2/2011 1:58 PM (GMT 0)

TC-LasVegas said...
Ziggy this may dismay you.

I agree. And Nevada is on the cutting edge side of the topic btw.

I will only say we already have had this topic discussed at other meetings. But the rules here are different than the meetings we have and I also moderate them.

We have to respect the rules in place. If they change I will work for the patient as best I can within the parameters set to moderate.

I have to.

Tony

It doesn''t dismay me at all.

I know Nevada is soon to open MMJ dispensaries. You'll be surprised as we have more of them in the state than Starbucks.
Posted 4/2/2011 2:48 PM (GMT 0)
'Although as a preventative it doesn't work as my 40+ years of usage can attest to.'

Yeah, Tomatoes-ketchup didn't work out too well in that regard either as some have proposed it might, and I was (and remain) a hard core user of that product line.

Posted 4/2/2011 2:53 PM (GMT 0)
The title of this thread is pretty misleading, and the newspaper article does a rather poor job or summarizing the actual document.  The following summary statement in the actual document says pretty much the opposite of the thread title:  The CAM Board lead reviewers realized that the previous wording could have been misinterpreted as being a recommendation for prescribing Cannabis , which was not the intent of the Board. In addition, the current evidence for the antitumor properties of Cannabis is discussed only in the context of laboratory studies and not in research involving human subjects. It is discussed only in the summary section
✚ New Topic locked