I'm here in this forum on behalf of my brother, age 42, just diagnosed on 14 Feb with aggressive metastatic , stage 4 prostate cancer. It's a shock we are all still coming to terms with and we are finding the situation bewildering, largely because we are highly uninformed about
cancer, what all the terms mean, the different types, stages, and treatments, and don't know how to interpret what is going on with him and how to deal with it in terms of understanding how bad it is, or isn't. After blocking it all out of his mind inititally, he and we are now waking up to the reality of this and need to know how to deal and how to go forward. He is now depending on us, wider family, to find out what we can and to guide appropriately, so this is an education for alll of us. By way of background, he is married with three children, the youngest almost four years old; and his wife has some severe health issues going on as well, so an overall difficult situation. He has worked pretty much all his life and gave the impression of being fit but has been going to the docs on and off with back pain, now diagnosed as cancer.
We've managed to get together some of the medical records for the purpose of getting a second opinion and considering the possbility of treatment options abroad. The medical stats make no sense to us as at all, we simply do not know what it all means, so if anyone here can help to interpret all this we will be very grateful.
He had the biopsy on or around 9 Feb. Prior to that severe back pain but no problems with mobility or balance. Since the biopsy he has deteriorated significantly - experiencing severe pain in hips/buttocks, legs, losing balance and mobility ( possibly some incontinence as well). Initially we all panicked and thought this is cancer/cancer pain and it's spread with the biopsy but some internet research suggests it could be the result of infection. Has anyone else experienced this? Is this "normal" pain post biopsy? The course of anti biotics has finished; because there was a lot of pain over the weekend he will of course contact the urologist today about
the pain and see what he says.
To make matters worse, the urologist, who was the first point of contact in all this, and the one to break the news, was not happy about
us saying we may be thinking of getting a second opinion and asking for copies of medical records. And, post biopsy, some tablets that should have been given/prescribed were not prescribed and those tablets - we think -were to stop the cancer spreading. Five days after the biopsy the urologist checked what medication he had been prescribed and noted that this tablet had not been given or prescribed, and then gave it to him.
He had the first hormone injection last Tuesday and sees a chemotherapist tonight.
These are the results so far - please help us to understand these results and what it all means:
MRI for back pain on 1 Feb:
MRI lumbar scan - central disc herniation at L5/S1 level "impinging slightly on both S1 nerve roots"
Annular bulge at L4/L5 - does not appear to be causing any nerve root impingement
widespread abnormaility of marrow signal in all lumbar vertebrae and sacrum consistent with multiple secondary deposits
view of pelvis shows extension of abnormal marrow throughout bones and in proximal femoral
left iliac wing considerably expanded by presumed secondary deposits
craggy prostate gland with apparent tumour extending beyond capsule on left side posteriorly
some enlarged pelvic lymph nodes
most likely due to disseminated carcinoma of prostate
Radiologist Report, imaging on 3 Feb
multiple lytic lesions throughout axial skeleton, largets within left iliac blade associated with soft tissue mass and left symphysis pubis
no collapse of vertebrae
enlarged lymph nodes, largest at right common iliac bifurcation 26mm diameter and in left para-aortic region 32mm diameter
small consolidation within right mid zone, no evidence of pulmonary metastasis, no thoracic lymph node enlargement; no pleural effusions
liver clear;cholecsystectomy noted; pancreas and kidneys spleen unremarkable. 10mm left adrenal lesion of uncertain significance
large amount of nodularity within mesorectal fat.
conclusion: bony metastases, largest within left iliac blade, amenable to biopsy
primary not identified but suspect prostate given MRI
right common iliac and left para aortic lymph node enlargement
left adrenal lesion of uncertain significance
mesorectal fat nodularity
9 Feb protate biopsy
10 Feb, histopathology report
PSA90
Tier 4 + IHC/PP ( not sure if this is a clinic reference number or a result)
right apex - core 15mm L 1mm D 1(1) a/e
right mid -core 17mm L 1mm D 1(1) a/e
right base - core 20mm L 1mm D 1(1) a/e
left apex - 2 cores 15mm + 7Mm L , 1 mm D 2(1) a/e
left mid - 2 cores 15mm + 7mm L, 1mm D 2 (1) a/e
DjM 10.2.12 Jj 10.2.12
needle core biopsies all prostate tissue.
sections show infiltration by adenocarcinoma Gleason score 5+5=10, present in all cores apart from those from right mid proportions ranging from 80-100%; extensive necrosis.
immunostains to exclude neuro endocrine differentiation in progress
supplementary:
with immunostains tumoural cells are negative for CD56, chromogranin , synaptophysin and TTF-1,this excludes neuro endocrine differentiation
weak but definite staining with PSA
Lb 14.2.12
Letter 6 Feb from urologist to orhtopaedic surgeon
PSA 90.91 ug/L
imaging shows bony metastases in pelvis and abdominal lymphadenopathy
history back pain;minimal voiding symptoms
family history unremarkable
may benefit from targeted radiotherapy
14 Feb
letter from urologist to family doctor
he is well and got over prostate biopsies well
biopsies show adenocarcinoma Gleason pattern 5
chance this is neuro endocrine tumour, further staining being undertaken
provisional histopathological stage Gleason 5 + 5
started casodex last week ( maybe this is the one that was delayed by five days post biopsy)
next week will have first LHRH anologue injection, decapeptyl1.
That's it. We do not undertsand it all and it is frightening. We want to undertsand all this and face it and deal with it. Then we can give the right support and talk through the options realistically.
This is what we have in mind right now : to see professor Vogl at University Hospital Frankfurt to consider what options he can offer - this might include chemo embolisation and radiation ablation; we do not think these treatments are available in UK (London) which is were we are.
But if he is started on traditional chemo/ radiation now , we are not sure if the 2 treatments can work alongside each other or whether we have to opt for one or other.
Someone in the family suggested seeing a urologist in Germany who specialises in cancer - that's causing us a bit of a dilemma as we don't know which of the 2 would be best. Vogl isn't a urologist but he does the chemo and radiation so we're thinking maybe that's the best starting point for a second opinion and maybe he can go for a course of treatment - which we think is less invasive overall.Costs of course are a major consideration. If these treatments are not available in UK we hope there might be a chance of recovering these costs under the NHS, but don't know for sure.
What are we looking at in terms of posisble treatement options/ best treatment options and what should we expect in terms of pain? Could the pain he now has be cancer pain? or is it from infection post biopsy which will clear with anti biotics? It's very confusing.
Thank you for reading all this. Any/all input really appreciated.
Post Edited (WORKING MAN) : 2/27/2012 3:32:17 AM (GMT-7)