Hi there,
This may start a little controversy among us, but the "gold standard" of PC cure is surgery -- of course, that is for cases that are considered curable. Yes, your husband's PSA is very high, but it sounds like he has a good chance to be cured.
One thing about
surgery is that the pathologist's exam of the removed prostate is the ONLY way to know the true extent of the disease within the gland. about
30% of the time, the post-op pathology differs from what the biopsy predicted. Remember that a biopsy only samples perhaps 1% of the entire prostate -- whereas the post-op pathology examines the ENTIRE prostate.
In about
half of this 30%, the PC grade is UPGRADED (worse than predicted) and the other half find the PC grade to be DOWNGRADED (not as bad as first thought).
It is very possible that either surgery OR radiation could cure him. But yes, you are correct that you cannot fall back and go with surgery if radiation is the initial treatment and it should fail. At least this is true for external beam radiation -- because the scar tissue built up around the prostate, from the radiation, makes it very difficult to reach the prostate.
On the flip side, if the surgery should fail, radiation CAN then be given. Sometimes it is planned this way in advance. This is called "salvage radiation" -- which means it is an attempt to complete the cure that was begun by the surgery.
With external beam radiation as the primary treatment, some medical experts fear that the radiation, itself, could trigger its own case of cancer 15-20 years into the future -- and your husband would still be a young man. You can ask a radiation oncologist if this is true, or if the latest radiation technology has solved this problem.
It is very wise of this urologist to request your husband's original biopsy slides so a second opinion can be made.
Your husband's Gleason Scores are not too bad. The 3+3=6 is a low risk cancer. The Gleason 7 is not as bad as it could have been because it is a 3+4 (as opposed to a 4+3). The prevailing type of cancer cell within a sample is assigned the first number and the secondary (if any) type is the second number.
Thus, with 3 being less aggressive than a 4, his Gleason 7 is the "less aggressive" type and can almost be thought of as Gleason 6.
However, his high PSA number suggests that treatment should be done as soon as he is recovered from the biopsy -- probably within the next couple months.
After getting the results of the second biopsy opinion, here is what he should do:
1- visit a HIGHLY EXPERIENCED radiation oncologist & learn the pros & cons of external beam and seeding.
2 - visit a HIGHLY EXPERIENCED urologist/surgeon & learn the pros & cons of a radical prostatectomy,
which is the complete removal of the prostate & related glands. This could be the same urologist he
is seeing now.
After weighing all the good & bad points as applied to his situation, you & your husband can make an informed decision based on his confidence & comfort level. In ANY case, make sure that the doctor has performed at least SEVERAL HUNDRED treatments of the type he chooses.
If you go for surgery, the success rate between
open and robotic procedures are about
the same. So it would be fine if he needs to avoid "Mr. DaVinci."
With your husband being so young, he would likely recover very will from surgery. The skill of the surgeon is VERY, VERY important. That is why 300+ previous ones are important to ensure that a surgeon (or radiation oncologist) is beyond the learning curve.
If they are able to do nerve sparing surgery (this refers to the nerves that control erections), he should also recover nicely in the sex department. However, be sure to make sure the doctor discusses the probability that erections probably will NOT be at the same level as however they were before the surgery. I think this does differ from patient to patient, though. And it can take anywhere from a few months to a few years before erections return.
He should also be continent after surgery -- after a short time where there is some leaking, etc. But eventually he should be 100% continent, assuming that nothing out of the ordinary takes place.
What a shame that your husband had to "trick" the doctor into giving him the PSA test. The fact that it led to the diagnosis shows the folly of the medical profession (or insurance companies) for not doing PSAs before a certain age.
You might want to purchase the 3rd edition of Dr Patrick Walsh's "Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer." It has tons of info!
There will be lots of people here jumping in with additional advice & info for you, so stay tuned.
Good luck to him!
Chuck
Resident of Highland, Indiana just outside of Chicago, IL.
July 2011 local PSA lab reading 6.41 (from 4.1 in 2009). Mayo Clinic PSA Sept. 2011 was 5.7.
Local urologist DRE revealed significant BPH, but no lumps.
PCa Dx Aug. 2011 at age of 61.
Biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma in 3 of 20 cores (one 5%, two 20%). T2C.
Gleason score 3+3=6.
CT of abdomen, bone scan both negative.
DaVinci prostatectomy 11/1/11 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), nerve sparing, age 62.
My surgeon was Dr. Matthew Tollefson, who I highly recommend.
Final pathology shows tumor confined to prostate.
5 lymph nodes, seminal vesicles, extraprostatic soft tissue all negative.
1.0 x 0.6 x 0.6 cm mass involving right posterior inferior,
right posterior apex & left mid posterior prostate.
Right posterior apex margin involved by tumor over a 0.2 cm length, doctor says this is insignificant.
Prostate 98.3 grams, tumor 2 grams. Prostate size 5.0 x 4.7 x 4.5 cm.
Catheter out in 7 days. No incontinence, occasional minor dripping.
Post-op exams 2/13/12, 9/10/12, PSA <0.1.
Semi-firm erections now happening 14 months post-op & slowly getting a bit stronger.
Post Edited (HighlanderCFH) : 3/15/2013 1:07:12 AM (GMT-6)