artmac said...
FYI - addl. information. The doctor is a personal friend (I coached two of his sons in football and we have college season tickets together) so there is a level of trust but I also will have a level of distrust per all of your input.
If he is a friend he will understand you asking for his hard outcome metrics, getting other opinions and potentially choosing to have the surgery at a national center of excellence. If you end up traveling to have the surgery done by someone at Hopkins, Cornell, etc. who has done thousands of these and has substantially better outcome metrics than his, that's not like you slighted him to just go across town to someone else.
I didn't have a urologist when I was diagnosed and I saw two excellent local guys one of whom suggested - with no prompting from me - that I consider going to a national center of excellence if that would make me feel more comfortable with my chances. That's what I did (actually I had consults at three national COEs and chose surgery at Hopkins), but the local guy who proposed this now is and indefinitely will be my local urologist.
You get one shot at this. While virtually no one dies on the table or has serious intra-operative complications, the variability in oncological outcomes (actually getting all the cancer out) is stunning... good surgeons may leave some behind 8-10% of the time in the
best case scenario (pT2) when cancer is still confined to the prostate! By contrast, for the best handful of surgeons in the world this is below 2%.