Posted 10/18/2015 12:42 AM (GMT 0)
I read a commentary on the FDA approval. That writer stated that the two manufacturers had been trying to get approval for eleven years, but could not satisfy the volume of patient data that the FDA wanted to see. So, a few months ago, one of the companies submitted a different application asking that their machine be certified for removing prostate tissue. It was.
So, that means that the machine was approved as a type of surgical knife, but did not address its effectiveness for cancer. Now, of course, because the process is "approved" for removing all prostatic tissue, that includes cancer. So, yes, there is more legitimacy in using the device and process, but the patient has no more assurance of long term outcome than before.