Posted 6/3/2016 5:20 PM (GMT 0)
Mel –
After Dx and subsequent RT about five years ago, I too experienced the inflow of the how-are-you-doing types of inquiries, usually from relatives, but sometimes from friends.
After realizing that I was pretty much saying the same thing over and over again in response to their same questions, I decided that as short and as objective as possible an answer was the best approach for informing the questioner, and at the same time keeping the conversation short:
Q: How are you doing?
A: Well, following diagnosis I received radiation therapy for it, and a number of follow-up tests are so far indicating that the treatment was successful.
Q: Okay, but how are you feeling?
A: Well, as the apparent success of the treatment I just described would suggest, I should be feeling fine, which in fact I am.
Usually that would be enough to satisfy the questioner, this objective, almost medical report, type of response. But in case the person persisted, I would simply respond "So far so good" as many times as necessary to further questioning without elaborating.
It occurs to me that if I had had to do so (never did, actually), I could also have gone into a very detailed, technical answer, to discourage continued discussion:
Q: Tell me again, how you are doing?
A: Well, the radiation therapy I received was 9 weeks of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, delivered in increasing packets to a maximum of 81 Grays received, producing eventual apoptosis in irradiated cells, and eventual diminution of cell presence, as measured by prostate specific antigen levels, measured in nanograms per milliliter.
A: Well, um, okay. (Followed by silence and eventual change of subject).
(Of course, if you do choose this approach, you can change the above treatment parameters to match those of your own treatment).
So that's one way to respond, which I did find to be effective: objectifying my responses like that did seem to cut the conversation short.