island time said...
If I'm reading your post correctly...you went with the younger surgeon. If so....then you you're down on what I'm talking about? It's like you weighed your options...and even though you might not have had the best feeling about the younger surgeon....you... "compromised" your instincts and chanced it with the younger surgeon....A) Because he's the surgeon...and it's he...that should know *** he's doing....and B) It was a "business decision" on your part....that being....it's much more convenient going with this guy knowing the RT is right around the corner?
(If so...that's EXACTLY what my situation way). Did I describe your situation...thought processes and feelings...accurately Rob? Thank you so much man....
Yeah, you pretty much nailed it. I had concerns about
the surgery in the first place, because it was totally elective, not totally necessary other than to get the SRT underway (and maybe if push came to shove there might have been another way to get around the incontinence). I went into it knowing there was a high rate of revision. I even discussed that with the surgeon beforehand. Nonetheless I was very apprehensive about
the whole thing right up until the moment they knocked me out.
When we moved to Florida last year I had to choose between the older guys further away or the younger guys closer by. Third option, and not even considered, would have been driving to Tampa to go to a big cancer center at a big hospital and
still end up taking my chances with whoever I ended up with there.
I researched both the old guy and the young guy. Both had similar ratings. The older guy has a reputation of being pompous and arrogant. The young guy is very friendly and if he were not my doctor I would love to have him as a friend. Furthermore I have had several doctors already who either retired or died on me (or did both), so decided to go with the younger guys who might be still practicing when I'm 80.
So for various reasons I chose the younger, closer, friendlier guys. Not to say anything would have gone any differently with the older, crankier guy further away. BTW don't worry about
the whole thing about
offending me or putting words in my mouth. Maybe I am a bit sensitive, but I'm not
that sensitive. I do appreciate the thought though.
There's another whole ball of wax about
the urologist who had done my original biopsy a few years ago and missed the tumor entirely. I do understand that he did what he could given the framework within which he must operate. After all, I did lose an additional year after that just because I was preoccupied with our retirement and move south. But as I stated in Prato's "life work" thread (perhaps not well articulated) but if I had known
more about
PCa or if that Uro had done a better job of trying to inform me of what the risks were, things certainly might have gone entirely differently, and all the subsequent treatments... SRT, AUS and its revision, might not have been necessary at all.