cashlessclay said...
I find my PSA results highly correlated with weight.
"highly correlated"...so a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.7 or greater? This is really easy to measure, if you're going to use words like that. Or did you mean to say: "It
seems to me that there is a positive correlation—when one goes up, the other goes up—but I haven't ever really taken the couple minutes necessary to calculate the actual correlation coefficient, so I don't really know if it's a strong correlation, weak correlation or just statistically scattered data."
cashlessclay said...
...if I gained a pound or two my PSA results are much more likely to disappoint than if I held steady, or lost a pound or two.
The first comment appeared to be wide-eyed, but this second one is just preposterous. That's a single percent of your weight. Gotta respect your effort—"A" for effort—but your unsophisticated approach appears to be chasing windmills. There's a zillion variables you are
not controlling for which probably contribute more that 1% weight variation. SNR problem.
But at the end of the day (tip of the hat to Gemlin's recent post), if it feels good, do it...and
whatever it is, do it until you're satisfied!Post Edited (NKinney) : 5/24/2018 4:09:02 PM (GMT-6)