kazbern said...
JHarvey, everyone's an individual. Your individual tolerance of risk, your individual disease path, your individual needs re: work/family/personal life.
From my GI's point of view, I'm not "sick enough" to merit a step up on the chain of meds. I haven't had bloody stool in years. I rarely pass mucous. I haven't had diarrhea in months. During the worst of my flare last year I lost about 5 lb. My weight is normal, my BMI is 23.
My biggest complaint for a long time has been joint pain. I have arthritis in my sacroiliac joint from this illness, and I cannot turn back that clock. So if I went on stronger meds like my rheumatologist wants me to, the improvement in my daily lfe from reduction of bowel symptoms would be slight, potentially much more significant would be the reduction of knee/shoulder/elbow/hand/SI pain. But it won't fix the changes in my SI joint.
My GI put me on sulfasalazine more than a year ago, an "old" IBD med that has recently come back into favor because it seems to successfully address joint pain in IBD patients. It worked really well for my hands, less so for the other large joints (shoulder/elbow/knee/SI). Since my hand pain was above and beyond the most debilitating of all of these, I am pleased.
I still have a chronic illness, and I still have bowel symptoms. I have ongoing right upper quadrant pain that needs to be addressed (probably more imaging studies before I know what to do next). So the option for stronger meds is still out there for me. I have a lot of years left to step up the meds, and I do get anxious sometimes about increasingly worse arthritis in my SI - stronger meds would stop that in its tracks. My rheumy had me do a pelvis MRI with contrast last fall to see if there was active inflammation in the SI, and there was not. So he backed off.
My point is that managing this illness is quite complicated and what works for one person is not necessarily right for another. Plenty of GIs have joined the thinking that strong meds in the beginning leads to a better outcome overall, others have not agreed. It's something for you to think about carefully.
"Plenty of GIs have joined the thinking that strong meds in the beginning leads to a better outcome overall, others have not agreed. It's something for you to think about
carefully "
My GI said that steroids are a last resort. I posted this on another thread and some people jumped on me. Like you said above we are all different and i am thankful that i have my current GI because all the other "less powerful" drugs have done wonders for me with zero side effects.