I was all set to get surgery over the holidays and had (while taking a deep gulp of resignation) made the decision- only to basically get turned down because the surgery center's analysis of the biopsy slides i brought with me, conflicted with my local pathologists analysis. The locals said mild pancolitis and normal mucosa in terminal ileium. The surgery center's analysis of the same biopsies showed active inflammation in ileium and inactive inflammation (albeit non patchy, continuous) throughout the colon.
The real confusing part is that non patchy pancolitis, even if one (but not both) set of patholigists labelled it as inactive, is inconsistent with crohns. I have never had a crohns dx. But it got me to thinking- isnt basically everyone on this forum obsessed with pain in their rectum? My flares never begin the rectum, at least not in the past ten years. Indeed, I am flaring right now again, with oajn and D, but all the pain and gurgling is up in the mid abdomen, not the rectum.
Is there so much as anyone in this forum, with confirmed UC, that doesnt seem to have much or any rectal activity, and whose pain and flares seem centered way up deeper? Of course, if I have multiple D's a day, eventually I get rectal pain, and I have internal hemmies so eventually they woukd even weep blood... But heck, jpouchers esp after takedown have that issue without a colon.
Any ideas? I am planning on getting a third opinion on the biopsies, and will eventually get another scope plus a full MRI or CT (last CT was years agomand showed squeeky clean upper GI- that after decades of IBD).
Post Edited (Probiotic) : 1/19/2013 8:10:12 AM (GMT-7)