I had non-patchy inflammation, so continuous inflammation does not always mean UC. This especially applies if the patient has already been on meds which might have partially and unevenly healed the colon.
Besides, there's microscopic evidence which the docs are looking at, too, they don't just go on the visual appearance of the colon to assess UC/CD.
Edit: And, no, there's no blood test to diagnose Crohn's. Faecal calprotectin (which involves a stool test, but whatevs) is highly sensitive to gut inflammation, which in turn is very useful for distinguishing IBD from IBS but not Crohn's from UC. Blood tests usually test for non-specific inflammation markers, eg CRP. The closest to a diagnostic blood test for Crohn's is the Prometheus test, but that's still a bit controversial and not widely used. Colonsocopy with biopsies are still the standard for diagnosis, really.
Post Edited (NiceCupOfTea) : 10/1/2013 8:17:15 AM (GMT-6)