Pluot said...
deltaforce said...
Pluot said...
I take 2,000 IU per day and a 50,000 IU rx pill twice per month. I couldn't get above 40 on just the 2000 per day, since adding the 50K at my GI's suggestion I've gone up to 60. Pretty happy!
I hope, You are supplementing with A, E and K2 as well, else you may see deficiency in them.
Can you please explain this?I came across some literature that talked about
how these fat soluble vitamins interact with each other in the system and how all of these need to be in balance for well functioning. How supplementing one Vit can be detrimental because it uses up the reserves of other vitamins.
Vit D is a major player in calcium transport in the body. Once you start supplementing with Vit D, calcium deposits, if any, will be relocalized to bones and the arteries. Should you not supplement with Vit K2, the calcium that is needed in bones but not the arteries, will go the arteries as well, developing a possibility of atherosclerosis. Essentially, K2 is a signal to tell calcium to go to bones and not to arteries. Hence you need K2.
There are similar explanations to A and E as well but I don't remember them. I just made the notes and since then I have been supplementing 10K IU of Vit A, one caplet of Super K and 400mg each of alpha and gamma forms of tocopherol once a week (in addition to 2000 IU of Vit D daily). Plus, I get some 20-30mg of K2 through my multivitamin daily.
I will re-evaluate this regimen in next summer and decide if I should keep it.
@Gary,
This research will keep coming and going, but I personally believe, they help. Plus, I think that the way this study has been analysed has a ton of flaws. If a smoker starts drinking carrot juice or Vit A with beta carotene in it, it is certainly going to increase his odds of developing lung cancer but someone making a blanket statement that Vit A is bad because it develops lung cancer is plain wrong. Certainly, I still think that clean and good quality food is the best source, but in the age of Monsanto, we don't have that.
IMO, such kind of research is practically impossible because of the zillions of variabltes it will need to incorporate in the study.
Stealth brought up an interesting topic. We are/were riding high on low cholesterol diet / low fat dairy, but we fail to understand that it IS detrimental to our health. Cholesterol is a building block of our body and although increased cholesterol is signaled as a risk factor for CVD, I strongly believe that is a load of BS (and now they want our teenagers to start popping the statin pill, ignoring the side effect it brings). Low fat food is promoted to fight obesity, my arse, it is promoted so that dairy industry can sell you watery milk and make a ton of money from selling you cheese and pricey fatty products. I wonder, how many really control their obesity by reducing fat intake.
Offnote, I just finished reading 2 books on milk industry and they discuss how milk is one of the cause of so many inflammatory diseases we have been noticing in modern world (along with politics of it). If anybody wants to read those books, drop a line.
My brother was obese. When his wife was pregnant, it was hard to figure out who was pregnant, him or his wife. He met an old school nutritionist. She asked him to jack up his good fat intake, reduce industrial oil intake, add exercise and good quality good and viola in 2 months, he is down 30 lbs (from about
225lbs).
Please note, I am not promoting conspiracy theories. I am trained as a pharmacist, I never practiced it but DS getting diagnosis of Autism forced me to look into alternative options and it is enlightening to see how we are fooled and brainwashed into believing something that is plain BS, right from the school days. We engrave so much on our brain that we don't tolerate negations, until we burn our fingers.