beave said...
What these diet discussions fail to recognize - time and time again - is that spontaneous improvement of symptoms, even up to and including endoscopic remission, occurs quite often in people with no medical intervention and no dietary change. In placebo-controlled studies of medications, those in the placebo arm improve at rates around 30%, time and time again, and many of those even achieve remission.
So when somebody says that changed their diet and 3 months later, or six months later, they improved, how do we/you know that improvement is actually from the diet change? The answer is, there is no way to know that. The reduction in symptoms and/or remission may have happened even without the diet. You can't go back in time and re-live those months and keep your previous diet and then compare. So the diet *may* have led to the improvement, but that can't be stated for sure.
I've had my Crohn's flare and then spontaneously remit several times over the years, with no medication and no dietary change. But if I were a proponent of diet, I could get on here and claim my daily peanut butter sandwiches are what keeps me medication free.
This, ten times over.
The diet types like to proclaim it takes many months or even years for the body to heal, even though there are no other circumstances where this painfully slow healing happens. I had my stomach sliced
open and my colon removed - a pretty dramatic injury you could say - and I was fully healed up within 4 months. The body is actually fairly quick at healing itself.