Humira & Remicade are basically the same drugs, re. lymphoma risks, side effects, etc. So you're reasoning on one being safer than the other isn't sound. I've been on Remicade for a little over 2 years, & it's been alright- some bad, mostly pretty good. If you get into remission with it, then stop taking it, chances are you'll flare again pretty quick. So why bother with it in the first place? It is definitely buying time for most of us, & I suppose we figure the possible complications are worth it- if I happen to come down with lymphoma one day, ask me again! Truly, how can anyone weigh the risks vs. benefits of a drug like this? you just get so sick that you're willing to try anything. So you take the Remicade, & hopefully it works well- then there's no way you can talk yourself into getting off it, even knowing the possible side effects. I would talk it over with your GI, tell him/her your fears & your plan of using Remicade as a vehicle to get into remission, see what they have to say. It's such an individual choice, it's very hard to advise on this, I find... I don't think anyone really thinks it thru- of course any sane person would say "Hell, NO!! I'm not taking something that risky!". But like I said, you're just so sick when you decide to go on it... you're not thinking clearly. And then you're so psyched if it works, you say "Hell, NO! I'm never going off it!". I won't lie, for me it's a time buying thing. Either something else will be approved, or I'll wind up in surgery.