canope said...
UC in UT - you are scaring me to death about<strong></strong> Remicade. It worked for me like a wonder drug the first two times I had the remission induction series, no side effects at all. This third time around it's not doing anything, and I just got out of the hospital. I'm on prednisone now and it's helping, but prednisone has so many dreadful side effects.<BR><BR>I just switched health insurance (my COBRA ran out), and the prescript<strong></strong>ion benefits in my new insurance are much worse. There is a high deductible, and I pay a percentage of the drug rather than a flat fee. I just got a call from my insurance company about<strong></strong> "fulfilling a request from my physician". I have a sickening feeling that they are going to ask me for a vast amount of money - those Remicade treatments cost $3400. I'm not working, and I can't work right now - not even at my own business. So I'm in a panic.<BR><BR>After reading what you have to say about<strong></strong> Remicade, and given the fact that I appear to have developed antibodies to it, perhaps I'll forgo the third infusion in the remission induction series. I'll call my doctor tomorrow to discuss.
Hey Canope,
My intention was certainly not to cause immediate alarm and fear so I apologize for that. I have been one of those "lucky ones" that seems to develop some kind of problem with almost every UC Med ever prescribed - that is why 3 months ago I elected for surgery as it became my only option. That does not mean it will happen to everybody.
However, I am currently working with an attorney related to a possible personal injury claim against Centocor (maker of Remicade and subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson). It seems that they were remiss in adding several different warnings to the Remicade label throughout the years - until recently when the FDA required additional warnings. Some of these warnings are related to the possibility of developing lupus, vasculitis, etc. I am not a "lawsuit happy" kind of guy but jury's around the country are agreeing with plantiffs that certain risks were not clearly outlined to patients. Had they been outlined clearly many patients would have been required to have additional (and very specific) blood work done when on the drug to check for specific markers in the blood.
Below is a link to one example of a lady that developed lupus, like I did, after the use of Remicade.
I post this not to cause fear but to share in my experience. If you look at the number of people on Remicade versus serious side effects you will find my case to be quite rare. Unfortunately, I traded UC and my colon for a life with Lupus.
http://sanantonio.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/texas-jury-awards-194-mil-in-remicade-lawsuit.aspx?googleid=209260