Posted 5/19/2017 2:38 AM (GMT 0)
Harmony:
With all due respect, that your prescribing physician is the "head honcho" of your local hospital system does not give him any special protections from federal/state prescribing oversight and monitoring that might be grounds for sanctions.
You would do well to follow the news and regulatory changes regarding pain management and narcotic prescribing. There are two respected sites on the internet that I subscribe to to keep abreast. I will make note of them and post the web addresses and get back to you with this information.
Until about 2 years ago, pain was considered to be the 4th vital sign - the others being pulse/heart rate, blood pressure, and temperature. Physicians were encouraged to provide prescriptions to meet patient pain needs. In many instances, patient satisfaction surveys queried patients whether their pain had been adequately treated. Physicians focused on pain relief knowing that patient satisfaction surveys would report instances of patient dissatisfaction due to pain, many a physician bonus tied to survey results and patient satisfaction scores.
Times have changed. A seismic shift in policy. The National Pain Steategy released in April 2016, drafted in collaboration with the CDC, NIH, and FDA, established strict prescription guidelines for narcotics and mandates implementation of patient and prescribing physician tracking.
A respectful physician will tread cautiously in prescribing a narcotic on an extended basis for a young person, such as yourself. Why? Any person taking a narcotic on an ongoing/continuous basis will develop a physiological tolerance to the narcotic. The body becomes acclimated to the narcotic and will experience withdrawal of the marcoticnis abruptly discontinued or the dose lowered too abruptly. The body will also become less sensitive to the narcotic over time. That is, a particular dose amount will become less effective, the individual needing a higher dose or dose increase to achieve the same effect.
At the age of 22, any physician who would promote higher dose adjustments or use of more potent narcotics would be doing you a grave disservice.
What would be your options for pain relief at a later point in time were you to have an acute injury or surgery? What options would you have to manage multi-site pain as you aged? The point is, your options would be extremely limited and possibly not existent.
When you hear exceptions for narcotic prescribing in cases of cancer, the truth behind the laxity of prescribing is that many of these individuals will succumb to advanced cancer. Physiological tolerance and concerns for pain control options in the far horizon is a
moot point.
While I know your pain is real and causes you distress, you need to realize that the fentanyl patch is not routinely prescribed for chronic knee tendinitis. Fentanyl is a potent narcotic. Not to be taken lightly. You are on a 50 mcg patch changed every 48 hours. Even here your physician has been generous. Changing of the patch every 3 days/72 hours is usually the norm.
That you have been prescribed 4 mg dilaudid for breakthrough pain is even more astonishing.
For thought: Your prescribing physician has been quite generous in the prescribing of a fentanyl patch and oral dilaudid. Yesterday is
not today. The regulatory environment of pain management has changed. Even physicaians at the top of the organizational chart ate affected by the changes.
Look to developing other tools at your disposal to help manage your pain. Ex. The practice of mindfulness and progressive relaxation: strengthening of the muscles that support the knee: use of heat and/ior mcold.
I have lived in the presence of constant pain for the majority of my life. It has been a process of adapting and adjusting. Ongoing.
You will find your way on the 50 mcg Fentanyl patch. Believe in yourself. And believe in your body's inate capabilities.
Namaeste,
Karen