Duh! Zanne is right on!!! I'd just tell this gastro, I won't do another scope this soon, if you want to do the Capsule Endoscopy I'm agreeable. The nuclear WBC scan, I'm agreeable. I am NOT doing another prep and scope this soon just for a "look-see". The SBFT just is NOT accurate enough to consider so I can understand his not recommending that. I'd also ask about
the fecal calprotectin test for monitoring of your disease activity every so often for the in-between times. But for now, the CE sounds like the absolutely best advice. Thanks, Zanne!!
PS if there were indiations of partial obstruction your 2nd scope you can insist on the Agile Patency Capsule before the CE.
BECAUSE we KNEW I had a partial obstruction at my old resection site when my gastro suggested the CE I was all for it 'cause I wanted to see too!!! BUT - I refused to do the CE UNTIL we did the APC first. Good thing I did. I didn't pass the APC. It dissolved and 4 days later I passed what was left of it (just that little rod). I know because I screened my BMs until I found the rod. (Hey! Don't get so icky, ugh! I spent 30 years scooping dog poop, collecting stool samples, mucking horse stalls, etc. plus raised 4 kids and their dirty diapers. The dirty diapers were the worst!).
The gastro in NY sounds like a good idea. I'd be inclined to go for it. You certainly have a right to a second opinion and a good doctor wouldn't feel threatened by your wanting a second opinion if presented that way. Especially if he is unsure, and the second opinion sought is w/an IBD specialist. My gastro isn't threatened by my trips to Mayo and in fact welcomes their reports.