Tom,
It helps to know that Remicade was first used specifically to treat those with fistulizing and/or severe CD. Remicade has been shown to be very effective at healing fistulae. As the use of Remicade became more widespread and further studies were done, the approach to deciding whom to use the medication on was changed. There are still two schools of thought in treating CD, the top-down and step-up approaches. Let me say first, that those adults diagnosed with severe and/or fistulizing CD are almost always treated agressively from the outset after diagnosis. I am not as familiar with pediactric usage so my comments pertain to adult treatments. Given the age of your daughter at diagnosis and that she is older now may mean that they are looking at treating her more like the adult patient.
I am not going to outline the step-up and top-down strategies. There's lots of info about
it and you seem to be a verocious reader/researcher. Start here for a good overview:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/560005_1I was diagnosed with mild CD of the terminal ileum. Did the usual - Entocort and steroids for the initial flare. Then the arthritis kicked in, debilitating arthritis that had me using a walker. Found out I had spondyloarthropathy that was severely flaring and the GI and rheumy said Remicade. I jumped at it because I was to the point of even needing assistance on and off the toilet. After the 3rd infusion, I stored the walker in the closet and was back to relatively complete mobility. The side benefit was my guts were unbelievably NORMAL. I went from diarrhea 10-20 times a day and severe dietary restrictions, to formed stools 1-2 times a day. For the first time in 25 years [!!!!] I could eat raw fruits and vegetables [except for my nemisis Romaine lettuce].
My last colonoscopy showed only scarring in my ileum from the healed erosins/ulcerations. At that point I had been off Remicade for 9 months. I took Remicade for 2 years, 9 months. I eventually had to stop because it was no longer effective at dealing with my ankylosing spondylitis. I went to Humira and took that for 2.5 months.
Remicade gave me my life back. But in fairness, and because I have written about
it here and you could certainly find it searching this forum, I am one of those people that not only developed lupus antibodies and lupus-like symptoms while on Remicade and Humira, I now have been diagnosed with lupus oputright. My GI feels I developed it from the Remicade. My rheumy thinks I had it underlying previously and was going to likely convert at some point. So who knows.
The biologics, especially Remicade, have grown in usage over the years. Therefore, more and more "issues" have come to light with them. As I have always advised, one must weigh the pros and cons in terms of ones medical conditions, previous treatments and responses and quality of life when deciding to take a biologic. I have thought long and hard about
what I would have done knowing the conditions I now have back when told that Remicade was an option. I still would have taken Remicade. My quality of life sucked. My mobility was practically nil and I needed care in all aspects of my life.
Sorry for this rambling post...the best to your daughter and you! ~~ Ides