OOPS ! Sorry, what I meant to have inside quote boxes, ended up the only things outside them.
(You should see me when I'm moving house.
) If a moderator knows how to sort that, please do so, I am thoroughly confused about
what I did wrong.
Having looked online, I can see it is available in the UK. But because I simply don't understand what exactly ions are, and no doubt other things too - basically ignorance of all things chemical, as opposed to biochemical - I have no way of spotting flaws in all the reassurance, which may just be hand-waving malarkey for all I know. There are some specific ideas used that really concern me, eg:
1 If it is an effective cleaner and pathogen killer in hospital wards it makes sense it would work internally.
Oh great, let's all take swigs of dilute carbolic acid, the original basis of all antiseptic surgery ! This, coming from a website that cannot spell "pH".
2 Cures malaria, hepatitis and AIDS in Malawi - hmm, that hotbed of education and medical research where no erroneous ideas about
AIDS are known to circulate. Good job all these pathogens so conveniently stay at a different pH from us, eh. I wonder what mitochondria do inside our cells, since they are basically remnants of trapped bacteria ? Might make my screw up with text boxes pale by comparison...
3 Nausea is a side effect caused by detoxification. Well, I am familiar with the Jarisch- Herxheimer reaction ("Herxing") and I can see why the medical profession is so wary of the whole concept. In essence, it turns medical orthodoxy upside down - being ill may make you dysfunctional, but it won't make you feel sick. It is only the body responding that makes you feel sick. Ergo, feeling nauseated is a sign of something going right. Well, I am simply unsure about
that, I reckon it is ambiguous. Having just read a simple primer on toxicology recently, I can see how nausea might simply be a result of the particular form a poison takes - whether it is the original substance that causes the ill effects, or the breakdown products when the body or something else reacts with it. The result being that sometimes nausea is caused by the original substance's effects, sometimes it is caused by an immunological or physiological reaction to the substance breaking it up. There is not a hard and fast rule. Some antidotes need to break poisons down, some try to preserve them intact; how lucky do we feel with chlorine dioxide ?
Is my logic at all erroneous here ? Anyone here see holes you can drive a truck through ?
An hour ago I thought I was thinking particularly clearly, but now the brain fog has descended upon me. I made the mistake of googling "myeloperoxidase deficiency", I can feel a chlorine induced headache coming on....