I was diagnosed with oste
openia a few years ago by a doctor I don't see anymore. He was concerned about
making sure I take calcium and vitamin D. My new doctor is a lot less concerned, and I'm following his lead.
The New York Times published an article in September that calls into question the diagnosis entirely. The diagnosis of osteopenia is new and -- I didn't know this -- controversial. Apparently, as one ages, bones become less dense. That's just the way it is. . . .
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/health/08bone.html?_r=1
NYTimes said...
Indeed, it was a W.H.O. panel financed by the pharmaceutical industry that in 1994 defined normal bone mass as that of an average 30-year-old woman. Because bone naturally deteriorates with age, anyone much older than 30 is likely to qualify for a diagnosis of osteopenia; using similar logic, a middle-aged woman might be said to have a skin disorder because she had more wrinkles than her 30-year-old daughter.